bader added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp:4554
+
+      // Language rules define if it is legal to cast from one address space
+      // to another, and which address space we should use as a "common
----------------
asavonic wrote:
> sdmitriev wrote:
> > bader wrote:
> > > Anastasia wrote:
> > > > What language rules?
> > > I suppose it's a generic note and author didn't meant some particular 
> > > language here. This change was contributed by @sdmitriev. 
> > > @sdmitriev, could you clarify, please?
> > This comment was originally added by @asavonic to 
> > clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp (lines 2962-2965 in this patch), and 
> > later I reused his code along with the comment in this file while fixing a 
> > very similar issue. So, I guess it would be more correct to ask Andrew to 
> > clarify. @asavonic, can you please comment on this?
> > This comment was originally added by @asavonic to 
> > clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp (lines 2962-2965 in this patch), and 
> > later I reused his code along with the comment in this file while fixing a 
> > very similar issue.
> 
> There is `if (Opts.SYCLIsDevice)` In CGExprScalar.cpp, so we handle SYCL 
> language rules.
> In SYCL, (almost) all pointers have default address space in AST, but in CG 
> some pointers become private/local/global, and some are lowered as generic 
> pointers. We need to add an implicit addrspacecast in CG to emit an 
> expression that expects the same type for its operands.
> 
> For example:
>     const char *str = ... ;
>     const char *phi_str = i > 2 ? str : "hello world!";
> 
> In AST types of `str` and `"hello world"` are the same (`const char *`). In 
> CG we emit `str` as `i8 addrspace(4)*` and `"hello world"` as `i8*`. At this 
> point we have to decide what type `phi_str` should have, and addrspacecast 
> the operands accordingly.
Is it possible to avoid fixing address space mismatch at this point by 
adjusting AST as suggested by John in this comment: 
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89909#inline-837495?

I wonder if it can be done w/o impacting C++ template metaprogramming as noted 
in this thread: 
http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/RFC-Re-use-OpenCL-address-space-attributes-for-SYCL-td4068754.html.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D89909/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D89909

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to