dblaikie added a comment. (generally I'd suggest splitting the clangc and llvm patches if at all possible - in this case I'm guessing the clang patch could go first (adding the attribute which would be redundant/unused initially), then the LLVM one?)
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D91840/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D91840 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
