rnk added a comment. In D91659#2458639 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D91659#2458639>, @rsmith wrote:
> @rnk Your thoughts on this would be appreciated. I think it's important to make MIDL happy if we can. As to how to restructure the code to get there, I took a look, but wasn't able to come up with any helpful suggestions without putting a lot more time into this. What is the issue with the current structure, ActOnTag produces the wrong AST node, an ElaboratedType, but we want to produce a TypedefType? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D91659/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D91659 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
