fhahn added a comment. In D86844#2484639 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86844#2484639>, @atmnpatel wrote:
> I might be misunderstanding the standard here but since 1 is a non-zero > constant expression, it can't be assumed to terminate by the implementation > right? The relevant section from C11 at least is "An iteration statement > whose controlling expression is not a constant expression that performs > [explanation of what it deems as progress] may be assumed by the > implementation to terminate" (C11 6.8.5 p6). I think these cases fall outside > of the scope of this particular change ... The source is C++, so the C11 standard should be irrelevant. I left a comment at D86841 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86841>, this seems more appropriate to discuss the issue, as it is unrelated to `-loop-deletion`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D86844/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D86844 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
