HsiangKai added a comment. In D94583#2514434 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D94583#2514434>, @jrtc27 wrote:
> In D94583#2513915 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D94583#2513915>, @HsiangKai wrote: > >> In D94583#2513070 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D94583#2513070>, @jrtc27 wrote: >> >>> There are a lot of "Resolve for v1.0" issues open against the spec still. >>> Are we sure we want to brand this as 1.0? It will end up as such in the ELF >>> attributes and thus be deemed compatible with future "real" 1.0 binaries. >> >> We could keep the version number as v0.9 or do you think it is better to >> keep it as v1.020201218. > > You don't want it to be higher than 1.0 either as that would be newer than > the future actual 1.0. Vector extension is under `-enable-experimental-extensions` in LLVM. Could we change the version number to v1.0 to align with current V specification? "Experimental v1.0" should be more consistent with "v1.0-draft" V specification. What do you think? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D94583/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D94583 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
