bcraig added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19412#414374, @rmaprath wrote:
> > On a bikeshed note: is `<__os_support>` the right name? Or should it be > > something like `<__thread>` or `<__threading_support>`? > > > I went with `__os_support` in case if we'd want to group further external > dependencies (like, for example, if some non-c POSIX calls are used in the > upcoming `filesystem` library). I can revert back to `__threading_support` if > that's preferred. > > Thanks. > > / Asiri I don't particularly care for <__os_support> either. Either of <__thread> or <__threading_support> are fine with me. Note that there are already other OS specific calls that libcxx has to handle. A lot of the locale code wants to use BSD style foo_l functions that are present on Linux. I prefer to keep the locale code independent of the threading code, as the two don't overlap much. For filesystem related items, I would expect those to go under <__filesystem> or <__filesystem_support>, or something similar. http://reviews.llvm.org/D19412 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
