dexonsmith accepted this revision. dexonsmith added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM. > This somewhat weakens the guarantees that we're referring to an existing > (option) record, but we can still use the option.KeyPath syntax to simulate > this. I agree that using `<option>.KeyPath` is sufficient to enforce ordering. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D95344/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D95344 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
