alexfh requested changes to this revision.
alexfh added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Herald added a subscriber: shchenz.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer.cpp:6
+// of this test file) is the macro itself and the spelling location is
+// <scratch space>:6:1 for some strange reason. This results this
warning
+// to be placed at the very beginning of the message list.
----------------
"results in ..."
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer.cpp:6
+// of this test file) is the macro itself and the spelling location is
+// <scratch space>:6:1 for some strange reason. This results this
warning
+// to be placed at the very beginning of the message list.
----------------
alexfh wrote:
> "results in ..."
The reason is that token pasting is used in the macro. There is no place in any
of the existing source files where the text of the token that is created by
token pasting exists (verbatim and contiguously).
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer.cpp:7
+// <scratch space>:6:1 for some strange reason. This results this
warning
+// to be placed at the very beginning of the message list.
+
----------------
"being"?
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer.cpp:500
+// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:54: warning: 'i' should be initialized in a
member initializer of the constructor
[cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer]
+// CHECK-FIXES: #define MACRO1 struct InMacro1 { int i; InMacro1() : i(0) { }
};
+MACRO1
----------------
Please add CHECK-FIXES: for the macro usage (unchanged, I suppose?). Same below.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer.cpp:514-515
+#define MACRO4(field) struct InMacro4 { int field; InMacro4() { field = 0; } };
+// C_HECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:65: warning: 'field' should be initialized in
a member initializer of the constructor
[cppcoreguidelines-prefer-member-initializer]
+// C_HECK-FIXES: #define MACRO4(field) struct InMacro4 { int field; InMacro4()
: field(0) { } };
+MACRO4(q)
----------------
Do we need these disabled check lines? If so, please mention the reason in a
comment.
Same below.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89380/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D89380
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
