jdoerfert added a comment. In D95764#2532908 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95764#2532908>, @tianshilei1992 wrote:
> In D95764#2532877 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95764#2532877>, @jdoerfert wrote: > >> In D95764#2532875 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95764#2532875>, @tianshilei1992 >> wrote: >> >>> So I suppose D95765 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95765> can replace this >>> patch, right? >> >> I think we want both. Propagating match clauses doesn't make sense to me so >> we should never do it. > > Is there any place documenting the propagation? The standard documents that nested contexts will inherit the selectors, in a specific way. given that this is an llvm extension, we can overwrite that though. I added the documentation changes now. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D95764/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D95764 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
