mtrofin added a comment. In D95849#2535939 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95849#2535939>, @jhenderson wrote:
> I assume this now runs cleanly. If so, LGTM. Probably worth mentioning on the > mailing list thread too, so wrap up that conversation. By the way, did we > ever figure out how many of the failures were genuine bugs versus deliberate > isntances? Except for the tests under llvm/test/Transforms/Attributor/, which D94744 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D94744> explicitly opts into allowing unused prefixes (and which @jdoerfert described as intentionally so), the rest (~1300) were bugs: i.e. unintentionally unused prefixes. Out of them, a small handful were spelling mistakes (identified as such during code review by their authors) and fixed rather than removed. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D95849/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D95849 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
