rjmccall added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td:4409 + calls to other ``swiftasynccall`` functions must be in tail position + (in all language modes). In particular: + - For C, this implies that ``return async_f();`` (``async_f`` is another ---------------- I don't think the "must be in tail position" here is true. Allow me to suggest an alternative way of saying this: > Within a `swiftasynccall` function, a call to a `swiftasynccall` function > that is the immediate operand of a `return` statement is guaranteed to be > performed as a tail call. This syntax is allowed even in C as an extension > (a call to a `void`-returning function cannot be a `return` operand in > standard C). If something in the calling function would semantically be > performed after a guaranteed tail call, such as the non-trivial destruction > of a local variable or temporary, then the program is ill-formed. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D95561/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D95561 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
