aaronpuchert added a comment. In D88220#2565768 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220#2565768>, @Quuxplusone wrote:
>> either way I'm a dead end — I don't consider myself authorized to "accept" >> Clang changes. >> You're still going to have to attract the attention of someone with the >> authority and/or force-of-will to say "okay ship it." > > Well, it's been a month since I said that. I'll land this tonight, unless > someone yells "stop" before then. If it causes any problems, we can revert it > easy enough. I think you're much more of an expert on implicit moves than most of us (except @rsmith perhaps). I've done a superficial review and didn't find anything objectionable, also we're early in the release cycle, so I think this approach is fine. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
