njames93 added a comment. In D97563#2625513 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97563#2625513>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> I think the implicit question is: won't this regress headers that are meant > to be compatible with earlier standards? > Did the original review mention anything about this? Clang-tidy already deals with that using the `--header-filter` option. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D97563/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D97563 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
