rjmccall added a comment. To be clear, what I'm trying to say is that — absent consensus that it's a major architecture shift is appropriate — we need to consider what functionality is reasonably achievable without it. I'm sure that covers most of what you're trying to do; it just may not include everything.
One of the fortunate things about working in a REPL is that many ABI considerations go completely out the window. The most important of those is the abstract need for symbol-matching; that is, there's practically no reason why a C REPL needs to use the simple C symbol mangling, because nobody expects code written outside the REPL to link up with user-entered declarations. So we can be quite aggressive about how we emit declarations "behind the scenes"; C mode really just means C's user-level semantics, calling convention, and type layout, but not any of C's ordinary interoperation/compatibility requirements. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
