aaronpuchert added a comment. In D99005#2640415 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99005#2640415>, @mizvekov wrote:
> We should expect the test above to work, by binding value to the rvalue > reference in task's promise, right? Precisely, we don't want to do any initialization at all. (There will be an initialization for the parameters in `BuildCallExpr`.) Implicit move just means that we're converting the lvalue to an xvalue. On second thought, since @Quuxplusone's proposal makes things so simple you can just do this right yourself: instead of the initialization just do the cast, as D68845 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68845> does it. That's it. Then let's see what we can get for C++20. If the proposal is accepted and gets DR status for `co_return` we might not need my change at all. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99005/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99005 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
