On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> > wrote: > >> Given that GCC rejects this code (and has done for as long as it's >> accepted the Enum::Member syntax), I don't expect the problems to be too >> widespread. If they are, we could trivially accept this as an extension; it >> seems like a pointless restriction. >> > > I think there will be widespread issues on Mac, where many projects > haven't built with GCC in years. > I've added some release notes in r268663. If people complain that this is breaking a significant amount of code, we can think about allowing this as an extension.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
