hokein added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/ProTypeMemberInitCheck.cpp:31
@@ +30,3 @@
+// Convenience utility to get a RecordDecl from a QualType.
+const RecordDecl *getCanonicalRecordDecl(const QualType &Type) {
+ if (const auto *RT = Type.getCanonicalType()->getAs<RecordType>())
----------------
michael_miller wrote:
> alexfh wrote:
> > Is `getCanonicalType()` important here? Did you try using
> > `QualType::getAsCXXRecordDecl()`?
> Probably not but I didn't try it. I just moved the previous function up to
> the top so I didn't have to forward declare it.
>
> One thing I'm simply unsure of is whether it's possible to get a RecordDecl
> that's not a CXXRecordDecl in C++ code. It seems like the answer is no but
> that might be another reason to keep it as is if I'm wrong about that...
> One thing I'm simply unsure of is whether it's possible to get a RecordDecl
> that's not a CXXRecordDecl in C++ code.
From the documents, `RecordDecl` and `CXXRecordDecl` present
struct/union/class, except `CXXRecordDecl` provides more methods for classes.
So I think you can try `QualType::getAsCXXRecordDecl()` here.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19993
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
