cchen added a comment. In D100514#2693600 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100514#2693600>, @jdoerfert wrote:
> Any reason we should not unconditionally use the OMPIRBuilder impl? (btw, > many thanks for providing one!) > We have an OMPIRBuilder always around in clang's codegen, so there is little > reason not to use it if it is feature complete. I'm fine using OMPIRBuilder as default. I was not set it as default since most of the clause/directive are still using Clang codegen as default (ex: `master`, `critical`, and `for` are now use Clang codegen as default). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D100514/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D100514 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
