dblaikie added a comment. In D100630#2697728 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100630#2697728>, @shchenz wrote:
> In D100630#2694681 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100630#2694681>, @probinson > wrote: > >> If DBX is going to be really pedantic about not recognizing tags or >> attributes that don't align with the DWARF version, maybe we're better off >> with really supporting `-gstrict-dwarf` and just have DBX tuning imply that. > > Hi @probinson thanks for pointing out the way, agree with this new solution. > After checking the codes, I found there are already `-gstrict-dwarf`, > `-gno-strict-dwarf` options in clang code base, but there seem no users of > them. Do you happen to know the story of these two options? I get a quick > search, no clue yet. Can we reuse these options for the intention here. > Thanks? I'd suggest checking the history of the commits that added them - but likely they were added for command line compatibility with gcc but I expect they're currently no-ops in Clang. Adding the expected functionality to them seems fine to me. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D100630/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D100630 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
