abadams added a comment. In D100981#2706899 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100981#2706899>, @dschuff wrote:
> Thanks. I had heard in the past that there were some other folks who had used > le32/le64 as a "generic" target (in fact that's why it's named so > generically, rather than being called "pnacl" or similar) but I haven't heard > of anything recently, and as you can see nobody has upstreamed any support > for other OS or target specializations or asked to collaborate on it. > Practically speaking even a target that wants fairly generic bitcode would > probably want its own triple, so unless this removal captures someone's > attention who wants to keep maintaining it, this should be fine to remove. I think that was us, the Halide language. Any suggested alternative for us to use now? This does indeed break all our llvm usage. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D100981/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D100981 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
