mstorsjo added a comment. In D101479#2740895 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D101479#2740895>, @phosek wrote:
> On other platforms the decision whether to use static or shared is controlled > by `-static-libstdc++`, does CL have a similar flag or shall we support > `-static-libstdc++` in MSVC driver as well? Hmm, well contrary to how `-static-libstdc++` works otherwise (you only need it while linking), you'd need to define `-D_LIBCPP_DISABLE_VISIBILITY_ANNOTATIONS` everwhere when compiling, if libc++ defaults to DLL linkage but you'd want to use a static version instead. Repeating the question - does the driver really need to know or care? Thanks to the autolinking directive in libc++ headers, the driver shouldn't need to explicitly link against the libc++ library at all? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D101479/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D101479 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
