Szelethus added a comment. While I still see checker silencing as a solution to a problem that shouldn't exist, I'm unsure about the amount of tedious and invasive work required to make the underlying infrastructure elegant just for the sake of it being elegant. Most notably, checker silencing solves the problem where a checker finds fatal errors -- disabling such a checker also gets rid of the sink node, which makes the entire analysis behave differently. This is desirable, as explained by @a.sidorin in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-August/063135.html. Although I still have concerns about the user interface if we promoted checker silencing to be user facing, it might be worth investigating a bit further.
Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D102683/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D102683 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
