bjope added a comment. Kind of the same take on this as @thopre .
I wrote https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48821 , and proposed https://reviews.llvm.org/D95789 , when I noticed that this pass caused troubles for two reasons: 1. to avoid that others would stumble upon the same problem (getting unexpected regressions due to switching pass manager) 2. not that important really, but getting rid of downstream diffs is always nice (at least when the problem is likely to cause problems for other targets as well) For the downstream target I've hacked around this a long time ago. I do think it was a bit sneaky to get this pass by default in the pipeline as part of the PM switch. It might have caused lots of trouble for the new-PM switch in the past, and still for some downstream contributors. So in that sense I'm all in favor. Although, a LGTM from me is a bit weak as I'm already using a workaround to skip this pass downstream. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D104099/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D104099 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
