> > 0x0000002a: DW_TAG_variable
> > DW_AT_name ("oldname")
> > DW_AT_type (0x0000003f "int")
> > DW_AT_external (true)
> > DW_AT_decl_file ("/folk/kkumar/tcllvm/llvm-build-lldb-
> rel/bin/test.c")
> > DW_AT_decl_line (1)
> > DW_AT_location (DW_OP_addr 0x0)
> >
> > 0x0000003f: DW_TAG_base_type
> > DW_AT_name ("int")
> > DW_AT_encoding (DW_ATE_signed)
> > DW_AT_byte_size (0x04)
> >
> > 0x00000046: DW_TAG_variable
> > DW_AT_name ("newname")
> > DW_AT_type (0x0000003f "int")
> > DW_AT_decl_file ("/folk/kkumar/tcllvm/llvm-build-lldb-
> rel/bin/test.c")
> > DW_AT_decl_line (2)
> > DW_AT_declaration (true)
> >
> > 0x00000051: DW_TAG_imported_declaration
> > DW_AT_decl_file ("/folk/kkumar/tcllvm/llvm-build-lldb-
> rel/bin/test.c")
> > DW_AT_decl_line (2)
> > DW_AT_import (0x00000046)
> > DW_AT_name ("newname")
I agree with David, this sequence doesn't seem to do what's desired.
There's nothing that ties "newname" to "oldname" here. What you
want is something more like this:
0x0000002a: DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_name ("oldname")
...
0x0000003a: DW_TAG_imported_declaration
DW_AT_import (0x0000002a)
DW_AT_name ("newname")
That is, there would not be a separate DW_TAG_variable for "newname";
instead, the imported_declaration would import the DIE for "oldname"
giving it the name "newname".
--paulr
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
