dyung added a comment. In D105457#2875672 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D105457#2875672>, @dblaikie wrote:
> In D105457#2874783 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D105457#2874783>, @nridge wrote: > >> To be honest, I don't really understand this error. It seems to come from a >> compile step (not a link step), and it comes from the assembler and says >> "symbol ... is already defined"? I don't think I've seen an error like that >> before. (Typically, errors about duplicate definitions would come from the >> linker.) >> >> Any suggestions for what it might indicate or how to investigate are welcome. > > Yeah, I'm with you there. > > @dyung @glaubitz - perhaps you two could help with a reduced example of what > causes this, it does look like a bug in the compiler (yeah, I'd at first > assumed a bug in the standard library that caused a link error, but as > @nridge pointed out it's not a link error but an assembly error - which > really looks like a compiler bug to me) - but likely there's some room for a > workaround if we knew what we were dealing with and how to workaround it > reliably. @nridge, from the commit message of your revert, it sounds like you are able to locally reproduce the failure? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D105457/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D105457 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
