morehouse added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp:2068
+    EmittedMDIdGeneralized = true;
+  }
+
----------------
This code also seems unnecessary as it puts metadata on function definitions.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp:2177
+      !CodeGenOpts.SanitizeCfiCanonicalJumpTables ||
+      CodeGenOpts.CallGraphSection)
     CreateFunctionTypeMetadataForIcall(FD, F);
----------------
Also seems unnecessary.


================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/call-graph-section.c:20
+
+// CHECK-DAG: define {{(dso_local)?}} i32 @baz({{.*}} !type 
[[F_TPRIMITIVE:![0-9]+]]
+int baz(char a, float b, double c) {
----------------
Do we still expect type metadata on function definitions on the latest diff?


================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/call-graph-section.c:39
+  fp_qux(0, 0, 0);
+}
+
----------------
necipfazil wrote:
> morehouse wrote:
> > Should we also add a test with a C struct parameter?
> I will add one.
I mean an indirect call with a type like this:

```
void foo(struct MyStruct s)
```

Currently all the tests use primitive types.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D105909/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D105909

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to