cjdb added a comment. In D106394#2893681 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106394#2893681>, @Quuxplusone wrote:
> If IWYU has already developed a de facto standard for this information, I > would recommend libc++ just use it (perhaps with no changes needed in clang > at all). This would have the benefit of getting libc++ to work with IWYU > out-of-the-box, instead of having to go beg IWYU to implement support for a > new `#pragma include_instead`. Is any IWYU developer aware of D106394 > <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106394> yet? You should definitely try to get them > involved here. This suggestion misses the fact that this change issues a warning to users who include detail system headers and the fact that Clang can use this to improve its diagnostics. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106394/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D106394 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
