aaron.ballman added a comment. In D106577#2897522 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106577#2897522>, @jyknight wrote:
> I'm not sure we should be populating this. > > The _value_ is determined by what libc supports, so it probably needs to be > left up to libc to define it. Why is the value determined by what libc supports? The definition from the standard is: If this symbol is defined, then every character in the Unicode required set, when stored in an object of type wchar_t, has the same value as the short identifier of that character. That doesn't seem to imply anything about the library, just the size of `wchar_t`. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106577/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D106577 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
