rnk added a comment. In D106721#2902586 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106721#2902586>, @efriedma wrote:
> We won't call compiler-rt for i128 multiply on aarch64. It's not worthwhile > under any circumstances. > > Pattern-matching 64/64->128 multiply in SelectionDAG legalization has been > reliable in practice, as far as I know. And even it misses due to weird > behavior in instcombine or something like that, we only end up with one or > two extra mla instructions, so not a big deal. Sounds reasonable to use i128 to me then. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106721/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D106721 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
