JonasToth added a comment. In D54943#2944680 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D54943#2944680>, @0x8000-0000 wrote:
> Using the checker now in our production BuildBot - no crashes and no false > positives. Can't say if there are false negatives, but at any rate the > checker is better than most colleagues at finding what should be declared > const. Perfect, that sounds very good! I will now continue with a bit of testing on open-source software, and if there are no crashes left, I would like to land this version. `transformation` can then be used to iron out the false positives and have this check stabilize even further. But if it is useful (especially for linting during dev), there is value :) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D54943/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D54943 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
