dblaikie added a comment. The current state of the root `.clang-tidy` accurately reflects the LLVM Coding Conventions as documented, which applies to LLVM and its subprojects (some subprojects have diverged from this standard).
The place for a discussion to change the naming convention is not here. It is on llvm-dev, like the original discussion that spawned the (not-yet-accepted, as it says in its opening sentence) linked proposal around variable naming. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D108265/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D108265 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
