bcraig added a comment. Note: You'll want to look at http://reviews.llvm.org/D20573, as there will be confilicts for whoever submits second.
================ Comment at: include/__threading_support:201 @@ +200,3 @@ +// Mutex +#define _LIBCPP_MUTEX_INITIALIZER nullptr +struct __libcpp_platform_mutex_t; ---------------- I'm not sure I like taking the freedom to define _LIBCPP_MUTEX_INITIALIZER away from implementers. Would it be too terrible to replace this entire #elif block with something like the following? ``` #if !defined(__has_include) || __has_include(<os_provided_thread.h>) #include <os_provided_thread.h> #else #error "_LIBCPP_THREAD_API_EXTERNAL requires the implementer to provide <os_provided_thread.h> in the include path" #endif ``` http://reviews.llvm.org/D20328 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
