aaron.ballman added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RegionStore.cpp:1692-1694
+            const bool IsOneDimensionalArray =
+                !isa<ConstantArrayType>(CAT->getElementType());
+            if (IsOneDimensionalArray) {
----------------
ASDenysPetrov wrote:
> aaron.ballman wrote:
> > ASDenysPetrov wrote:
> > > martong wrote:
> > > > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > +1 for Aaron's suggestion, but then it would be really helpful to have 
> > > > an explanatory comment. E.g.:
> > > > ```
> > > > if (!isa<ConstantArrayType>(CAT->getElementType())) { // This is a one 
> > > > dimensional array.
> > > > ```
> > > I think that self-descriptive code is better than comments nearby. And it 
> > > does not affect anything in terms of performance.
> > FWIW, I found the condensed form more readable (I don't have to wonder 
> > what's going to care about that variable later in the function with lots of 
> > nesting).
> I see what you mean. That's fair in terms of variables caring. I think it's 
> just the other hand of the approach. I don't have strong preferences here, 
> it's just my personal flavor because it doesn't need to introspect the 
> expression to undersand what it means. But I'll make an update using your 
> proposition.
FWIW, my preference is weak as well -- the code is readable either way. :-)


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D104285/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D104285

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to