nickdesaulniers added a comment. In D106030#3018754 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106030#3018754>, @aeubanks wrote:
> Would it be ok to split this into two attributes, dontcall-warn and > dontcall-error? So we rely less on the Clang AST when determining if a > dontcall call should be emitted as a warning or an error. Doesn't matter to me; go for it. `BackendConsumer::DontCallDiagHandler` is what looks at the AST. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106030/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D106030 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
