aaron.ballman added a comment. In D110656#3034971 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D110656#3034971>, @beanz wrote:
> In D110656#3034083 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D110656#3034083>, @xbolva00 > wrote: > >> Why just no special case "= {0};" pattern and do not warn in that case? > > This case did show up, but was not the majority of issues for LLVM (although > might be the majority we care about). The related `= {nullptr};` pattern also > shows a few times. > >> If there are more patterns, take it from other side - pick patterns where >> you are sure that they are wrong and developer needs to fix them and emit >> warnings for them. > > There are a bunch of places (particularly in LLVM instruction matching), > where LLVM generates data structures with statically sized arrays that hold > the maximum possible values, and rely on zero-initialized values to denote > the end of the used space. > > For the tablegen-genreated code wrapping in `pragma`s to disable the warning > works, but there isn't really a good way that I can think of to not emit a > warning for an array of 10 elements where we provide 6 in a general case > while also warning on the actual potential bug. This was the kind of thing I was worried about. I expect that this pattern also shows up (perhaps less frequently) in non-generated code as well. > In D110656#3034149 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D110656#3034149>, @xbolva00 > wrote: > >> If possible, @beanz could share list of new warnings from LLVM build here? > > The big offenders were the tablegen-generated asm and register matchers and > the target files under clang/lib/Basic/Targets. Those accounted for filling > my scroll back buffer a few times over... > > I'm running a new build now disabling the warning int he clang target files > to see how that shapes up. Will share what I find. Thanks, I'm curious to hear what you find! Another alternative to surfacing this as a frontend warning is to make a `bugprone` check for clang-tidy as the false positive rate seems likely to be more suited to that tool. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D110656/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D110656 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits