Author: etienneb Date: Mon May 30 10:05:10 2016 New Revision: 271207 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=271207&view=rev Log: [clang-tidy] Fix script adding new clang-tidy check
Summary: The `getName()` call is useless. It's better to show a better example as tutorial. Reviewers: alexfh Subscribers: cfe-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20766 Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/add_new_check.py Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/add_new_check.py URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/add_new_check.py?rev=271207&r1=271206&r2=271207&view=diff ============================================================================== --- clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/add_new_check.py (original) +++ clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/add_new_check.py Mon May 30 10:05:10 2016 @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ void %(check_name)s::check(const MatchFi if (MatchedDecl->getName().startswith("awesome_")) return; diag(MatchedDecl->getLocation(), "function '%%0' is insufficiently awesome") - << MatchedDecl->getName() + << MatchedDecl << FixItHint::CreateInsertion(MatchedDecl->getLocation(), "awesome_"); } _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
