rmaz added a comment. In D109632#3076586 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109632#3076586>, @vsapsai wrote:
> Methodology: clear a modules cache, compile a file once to pre-populate the > cache, compile file 8 times and measure elapsed time, take the time average. This is the same approach I used, although with 3 tries. > So it looks like "no external" approach is slightly but consistently slower 😢 > than "set dedupe" approach. This agrees with what I see with our code too. > I'm curious to get the results for an empty module cache because clean builds > are also important for us. I should measure this too. What would you suggest for the approach, to clean the module cache before each build, retry and average? How much weight should be given to the clean vs populated module cache numbers? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D109632/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D109632 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
