dblaikie added a comment. In D112971#3117441 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112971#3117441>, @dblaikie wrote:
> My understanding is that this is necessary for the legacy pass manager that > uses a global registration system - if you didn't reference any function in > the pass, then the code wouldn't get linked in - because the only way the > pass was accessed was through the registry? > > Does that sound right? Did this change break some legacy pass manager > registry functionality? Am I just generally misremembering/misunderstanding > how this worked or something changed to remove that model entirely? Oh, I see, you caught that and reverted it for that reason - no worries then! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112971/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112971 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
