aaron.ballman added a comment. In D51650#3126569 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D51650#3126569>, @akuegel wrote:
> Since it is not clear whether the semantic change was intended, I think it > makes sense to revert the patch for now. If it is intended, it might be good > to mention it in the change description, so that people are warned. That looks like an unintended change to me, likely due to the new mutual exclusion checks. Thanks for letting us know! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D51650/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D51650 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
