mstorsjo accepted this revision. mstorsjo added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
In D109856#3155235 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109856#3155235>, @danielkiss wrote: > In D109856#3154763 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109856#3154763>, @mstorsjo > wrote: > >> Looks reasonable I think. Is this a deficiency in the EHABI implementation >> only, i.e. this aspect works as it should in the regular dwarf >> implementation? > > Yes, it works on dwarf already ( also the test pass on X86/Aarch64 ). Ok, thanks for the clarification! CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D109856/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D109856 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
