erichkeane added a comment. In D114639#3162133 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114639#3162133>, @mehdi_amini wrote:
> In D114639#3162069 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114639#3162069>, @erichkeane > wrote: > >> In D114639#3162032 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114639#3162032>, @RKSimon >> wrote: >> >>> In D114639#3162000 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114639#3162000>, @mehdi_amini >>> wrote: >>> >>>> In D114639#3161303 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114639#3161303>, @erichkeane >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> IMO, if we're updating the MSVC versions, we should do the same for the >>>>> GCC/Clang/AppleClang versions too. For example, GCC 5.1 is from 2015, >>>>> and Clang 3.5 is from 2014. >>>> >>>> We've always handled MSVC update separately I believe, we can't just take >>>> the "last two version of MSVC" guideline and update every compiler each >>>> time. >> >> My understanding is this would only be the ~3rd time we've done this. The >> last time we did this, we did them all together. > > Right, but last time we did the motivation was specifically to get to c++14, > while here the motivation is to drop an old MSVC according to the > MSVC-specific support we intend to provide. My memory is that that was _A_ motivation, not the only one. There were quite a few GCC bugs that we were getting away from as well that was my primary justification for pushing it at the time, though the C++14 motivation was ALSO tempting/appreciated. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D114639/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D114639 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
