I'm not a person who can sign it off, but it looks good to me. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espind...@gmail.com > wrote:
> We do it just because gcc in some distributions do it. > > I can see why --build-id is useful for distributions, but given the > cost on day to day edit+build cycles, any distro using clang should > really just pass -Wl,--build-id in rpmbuild (or corresponding tool). > > Even upstream gcc is not as aggressive as current clang. It has a > --enable-linker-build-id configure option and it defaults to false. > > Cheers, > Rafael >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
