simon.giesecke added a comment. Thanks a lot for addressing this issue! I am just trying it on our codebase.
> The problem actually has nothing to do with the out-of-line definition being > inline; the problem is that hasDeclaration() of the memberExpr() will match > the out-of-line definition, which obviously isn't marked static, so > isStaticStorageClass() won't match. Hm, an out-of-line definition *cannot* have the `static` keyword. I wonder if it's actually a bug (in the AST? or just the matcher?) that `isStaticStorageClass` doesn't match here? I guess that other checks that use `isStaticStorageClass` might be affected by this too? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115106/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115106 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
