schittir added a comment. In D115320#3182581 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D115320#3182581>, @jeroen.dobbelaere wrote:
> When I try out the example on llvm-13, I get a 'omnipotent char' tbaa > description. That should be ok in general. When I replace the 'float > _Complex' with 'double', I do get the 'double' tbaa. That might be a better > example for the testcase ? Good point. I updated the test with this suggestion. Thank you. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115320/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115320 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
