MyDeveloperDay added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:1682
Current.NestingLevel == 0 &&
- !Current.Previous->is(tok::kw_operator)) {
+ !Current.Previous->isOneOf(tok::kw_operator, tok::identifier)) {
// not auto operator->() -> xxx;
----------------
curdeius wrote:
> MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> > curdeius wrote:
> > > Won't it break lambdas with an identifier (e.g. macro) before the arrow?
> > > E.g.:
> > > ```
> > > auto lmbd = [] NOEXCEPT -> int {
> > > return 0;
> > > };
> > > ```
> > it doesn't seem so, maybe one of the other rules is catching that
> >
> > auto lmbd = [] NOEXCEPT -> int { return 0; };
> >
> Ok, but I'd like to see it as a test case if we don't have something similar
> already.
let me add that for completeness before I commit
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D115903/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D115903
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
