andreybokhanko added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D18035#448057, @hfinkel wrote:
> We just received the first draft of that specification yesterday. Is this specification confidential? If not, why it hasn't been made available in this code review? Most puzzlingly, why it hasn't been shared with Dmitry, who obviously contributed the most towards making abi_tag supported in clang? > As far as I can tell, Richard also is very busy, like many of us, and it can > take time to get to things, even important things. I understand why this is > frustrating, but please don't become discouraged. I understand that Richard is super-busy and apart of doing a lot of stuff himself also reviews *a ton* of other peoples' patches (I wonder how he finds time... probably saves on sleeping :-)) But what's wrong with letting us (Intel) carry on some burden and implement this particular piece? Seeing how this review is developing makes me... yeah, discouraged is the right word. :-( Yours, Andrey ====== Software Engineer Intel Compiler Team http://reviews.llvm.org/D18035 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
