craig.topper added a comment. In D114425#3216231 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114425#3216231>, @philnik wrote:
> In D114425#3209794 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D114425#3209794>, @craig.topper > wrote: > >> What does the builtin due if __int128 isn't supported? Even though the type >> isn't legal the builtin can still be called with a narrower type that would >> be implicitly converted. Does that work correctly? > > Would the correct behavior be to throw an error in that case? Or what exactly > do you expect? gcc only defines the builtin if __int128 is a supported type. It doesn't look like it generates an error, it just leaves it as call to an unknown function. I don't know how easy it is to do the same in clang. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D114425/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D114425 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
