delcypher added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/Sema/warn-calls-without-prototype.c:39 + return a + b +c; +} + ---------------- @NoQ Any ideas about this? It seems kind of weird that when merging `not_a_prototype3` prototype with the K&R style definition of `not_a_prototype3` that the resulting FunctionDecl we see at the call site in `call_to_function_without_prototype3` is marked as not having a prototype. If I flip the order (see `not_a_prototype6`) then the merged declaration is marked as having a prototype. I'm not sure if this is a bug in `Sema::MergeFunctionDecl` or if this just a peculiarity of K&R style function definitions. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D116635/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D116635 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
