curdeius added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp:4810-4811
+
+  verifyFormat("#define STRINGIFY(t) #t\n"
+               "#define MAKEVERSIONSTRING(x, y, z, build) STRINGIFY(x) \".\" 
STRINGIFY(y) \".\" STRINGIFY(z) \".\" STRINGIFY(build)\n",
+               ZeroColumn);
----------------
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
> curdeius wrote:
> > Please test with something simpler.
> Did this show the bugged behavior without the patch?
> 
> Regarding the `// clang-format off` there is the question what do we want in 
> the tests? Show the long lines as the long lines, then we need to turn it off 
> some times. Or do we want to keep the limit and break the strings, thus 
> making it harder to read for the human?
> Did this show the bugged behavior without the patch?
Yes. I checked with a pretty fresh master.

> Regarding the `// clang-format off` there is the question what do we want in 
> the tests? Show the long lines as the long lines, then we need to turn it off 
> some times. Or do we want to keep the limit and break the strings, thus 
> making it harder to read for the human?
I'm pretty much against adding `// clang-format off` too, it hurts more than it 
helps IMO.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D116859/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D116859

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to