rjmccall added a comment. In D97446#3241828 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97446#3241828>, @JonChesterfield wrote:
> I'd much refer we put variables in arrays corresponding to their intended > lifespan instead of the binary format they're destined for. I agree that LLVM features should generally mean something consistent across targets, and frontends should use the appropriate feature for the semantics they require. Here the problem is that, for better or worse, the source language has different semantics on different targets. Historically, that really has been driven by object format and the corresponding presumed linker behavior; I don't know where to begin answering the question of whether we should treat it as a platform difference instead when targeting a non-standard object format. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D97446/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D97446 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
